close
Bewitched Businesses: Halloween horror stories you repeat at your peril; who could forget the ‘Ratner-effect’?

Bewitched Businesses: Halloween horror stories you repeat at your peril; who could forget the ‘Ratner-effect’?

halloween

With Halloween season in full swing, some businesses owners could benefit from some truly chilling cautionary tales. From the infamous Ratner mistake to the failure of New Coke, we’ve assembled this list of the top business horror stories. Repeat at your own peril!

 

1.      The New Coke conundrum

 

The red Coca-Cola can is one of the most iconic cultural symbols of our time. Created by inventor John Pemberton in Atlanta, GA, in 1886, the original formula is an intensely guarded secret.

When arch-rivals Pepsi made their presence known amongst the coveted teenage audience, Coca-Cola made a bold move to guard its market share from its key competitors. So, the taste was adapted slightly, making Coca-Cola slightly sweeter in order to make it taste closer to Pepsi.

The product, which was named New Coke, was released in 1985. Within days, there was a huge outcry from those loyal to the signature coke taste, with many loyal customers calling for the brand to reverse its decision.

Their revised recipe had in fact alienated their traditional demographic, instead focusing on a smaller proportion who had chased for the sweeter alternative. This product was already available, and New Coke was simply a same-but-different choice.

In a matter of three months, New Coke was ditched from supermarket shelves to be replaced by Coca–Cola classic.

A huge lesson was learned, and if the course of events was any different then we might not have been as familiar with the powerhouse brand as we are today.

Take heed from the old Russian proverb “Trust, but verify” and make sure your market research and development stages are fool proof.

 

2.      Kodak’s multi-billion $ mistake

 

Kodak has been synonymous with photography for more than 100 years, from the era of box-brownie and pinhole cameras to disposable units, the brand had seen it all.

Founded in New York in 1880, by the 1970s over 85% of the market for cameras and film was controlled firmly by Kodak.

In 1975, Steven Sasson, a research and development employee was experimenting with a product called a charge-coupled device.

He found that if he could translate light into binary code, he could produce a 100,000 pixel image — or 0.01 megapixels as we’d refer to it now. The employee in question essentially built the prototype for digital cameras, creating a device which used a memory card and compressed images.

The idea wasn’t warmly welcomed by the more conservative forces from within the business though, favouring the traditional markets of film and paper where it held a lot of industry authorities. As a result, the device was never released out of the real fear that it would jeopardise the brand’s film sales.

They eventually made the switch to digital in the late 1990s it was too late, and Kodak had to file for bankruptcy in 2012 as a result.

The digital camera line was abandoned, and the brand now keeps its focus on the production of printer cartridges and motion picture film.

Here, we’ve established that shouting about your innovation is important, but equally staying aware of what your competitors are doing will save you any potential embarrassment if something goes wrong somewhere along the line.

 

3.      The Ratner Effect

 

In the 1980s, Ratners Group jewellers was a common sight on high streets across the nation, a family-ran business which spawned into a 900-strong store count during its peak.

The Ratner situation is testament to the fact that everything can change in a given moment, and the company’s CEO Gerald Ratner learned this the hard way.

A couple of misjudged remarks in front of a room full of journalists and business figures prompted a precipitous drop in revenue, as Mr Ratner lost more than a hundred million pounds in less than a minute after his remarks had proliferated around the room and later to the country.

He spoke about how his company could sell items so cheaply, explaining that the price point was possible because the products were “total crap”.

He added insult to injury, adding that his company sold earrings that were cheaper than a prawn sandwich from Marks and Spencer, but wouldn’t last as long.

Naturally, journalists were ready to splash their headlines off the back of Ratner’s offhand comments. Ratners share price plunged after the story hit the press, almost 300 stores closed and Ratner resigned as CEO.

The family name became a byword for calamity and the company had to undergo a full rebrand. The takeaway from this one is simply to be cautious and think before you speak, as it could land your business and your career in hot water!

 

4.      Meerkat’s failure to adapt

 

Launched in 2015, Meerkat was the first live video streaming app to utilise platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.

Initially, it was a huge hit with users, as ordinary people and celebrities alike realised that they could live stream on both channels at the same time.

However, Facebook and Twitter quickly clocked onto this, and developed their own streaming systems as a result — Facebook Live and Periscope. When they launched they also withdrew Meerkat’s access to their platforms.

Meerkat never recovered from this point on. It could have attempted to move towards a new niche, but most of the financial investment had been used up on paying for endorsements from celebrities and other backers, as opposed to targeting it at the actual product.

Many businesses get side-tracked by their initial fifteen minutes of fame, but it’s vital to avoid this and prepare for all eventualities in the meantime!

 

5.      Lost in space

 

George Bernard Shaw said “The United States and Great Britain are two countries separated by a common language” and it’s the same for numbers too.

In 1999, NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter fell victim to not only the vast expanse of the vacuum we call space, but it also combusted as a result of the metric measurement system. Engineers didn’t realise that European engineers working on the craft had worked in Imperial measurements and failed to convert them to metric.

The internal software was given data which didn’t correspond to the same units so when the system which controlled the thrusters calculated the force required in pounds, another system was telling it that it was in Newtons.

This Mars mission ended unceremoniously due to a simple mathematical miscommunication, and it was a costly lesson to learn.

The orbiter cost a staggering $125 million to build, but it taught a remarkably invaluable lesson to all involved: the value of basic communication, and the need to verify even the simplest of protocols — check, and check again!

As we’ve discovered, it’s never always plain sailing in business, and there are certainly some chilling tales to be told! Should your business encounter any misfortune or bigger threats such as a winding up petition, get experts on board.

Housing crisis: Millennials set to be ‘generation rent’

money management gen z

Digital Natives: Make way for Generation Z

Leave a Response

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Be informed as this exciting sector develops and receive DIY Investor Magazine free to your inbox – take control of your financial future